A Feast for Crows by George R.R. Martin (hereafter AFfC)
The fourth volume in the epic fantasy series A Song of Ice and Fire (hereafter ASoIaF)
for reference
AGoT=Volume 1: A Game of Thrones
ACoK=Volume 2: A Clash of Kings
ASoS=Volume 3: A Storm of Swords
Warning this review contains spoilers
I have been waiting for this book for over 15 months like the rest of the ASoIaF fans. They are long volumes and not for the word weary. Translation, if you don't like to read or a 30 page pamplet is your idea of a long book, this is not for you.
Mr Martin had originally intended this to be a longer volume as it was to bridge a 5 year gap, but given how much he wrote, he realized that it would be unpublishable. So he split the work into 2 volumes. The next A Dance with Dragons (hereafter ADwD) is due late next year... so translate that to mid 2007... The split is along the characters, as Mr Martin says in his book and on his site, he decided to tell all of the story for half of the characters in each book.
AFfC picks up shortly after the seminal yet tragic events of ASoS. The repercussions of the Red Wedding and the murder of Joffrey Barrethon still play havok with the events in the 7 Kingdoms proper. Cersei has been made unbalanced to say the least by the death of her son. Jaime is undergoing some sort of personal visionquest. though he is still a scumbag. Arya's quest for vengence and self protection have taken her to a dangerous new place. Brienne's quest for honor, both her's and Jaime's and perhaps the center piece of the book reveals much of the local devastation of the war. The events in Dorne on serve to add fire to an already volatile mix. To say much more would just reveal far more of the plot than I intend to.
Key questions one should consider are:
Who really are the crows of the title?
Where is Varys?
What if anything is going to be left to face the Others?
Who is the new Septon??? I have my suspicions.
Does the feel of armageddon begin to fill you after this book?
What really happened to Valyria and the dragons?
What really happened to the Green Men?
How much do we really know about the maesters?
As to my thoughts and feelings about events within, and FYI, spoilers abound here...
I really enjoyed Brienne's journey. I think the most important information gained was the devastation that the war has had upon the smallfolk and the attempts underway to recover. I think Mr Martin draws much here from war in the middle ages, wars that could never finish the job since extermination of a population was no longer an option (I refer here to the pre Christian idea of warfare which basically was, go in destroy everything, kill all the males, rape and enslave all women of childbearing age, kill the rest of the women and move on). Strangely, Brienne is not even on my top ten favorite character list but at least in this novel she was the second most important p.o.v.
Jaime as has been the case since Ned died and Jaime became a p.o.v. character, is the most informative about the history and the current state of affairs in the middle 5 Kingdoms. This new "maturing" Jaime, while still that love him or hate him scumbag, is now one of the big players in the game of thrones. A great bit of dialog, more a speech really, and I won't tell you the context... but be warned it is a spoiler so highlight to read
"and if I will not yield?"
Must you make me say the words? Pia was standing by the flap of the tent with her arms full of cloths. His squires were listening as well, and the singer. Let them hear, Jaime thought. Let the world hear. It makes no matter. He forced himself to smile. "You've seen our numbers, Edmure. You've seen the ladders, the towers, the trebuchets, the tents. If I speak the command, my coz will bridge your moat and break your gate. Hundreds will die, most of them your own. Your former bannermen will make up the first wave of attackers, so you'll start the day by killing the fathers and brothers of men who died for you at the Twins. The second wave will be Freys, I have no lack of those. My westermen will follow when your archers are short of arrows and your knights so weary they can hardly lift their blades. When the castle falls, all those inside will be put to the sword. Your herds will be butchered, your godswood will be felled, your keeps and and towers will burn. I'll pull your walls down, and divert the Tumblestone over the ruins. By the time I'm done no man will ever know that a castle once stood here." Jaime got to his feet. "Your wife may whelp before that. You'll want your child, I expect. I'll send him to you when he's born. With a trebuchet."
Maybe if Jaime had not thrown Bran out a window, or off of a wall to be techincal, and was not engaging in 30 years of incest with his sister... maybe he would be a likable character or maybe not but he is one godaweful son of a bitch.
Arya's chapters, while very enjoyable and I suppose I could say this about Sansa's and Samwell's too, seemed more along the lines of get them there chapters and "in the mean time" chapters. At least until... well that would be too much of a spoiler.
Who else is in there, a new character from Dorne... and the queen of all bitches if nothing else, Cersei.
A good way to sum up Cersei's journey through AFfC might be "the descent". Because that is more or less what happens in many different ways. She fucked, manipulated and murdered her way to the top...and it turns out that while she is a really good schemer, she is a horrible regent. One vad decision after another. All to "protect" her grasp on power, her remaining son, King Tommen whom I do not think will survive to adulthood.
In summary, AFfC does exacly what it is supposed to do, deal with the aftermath of ASoS, with the only caveat being that ADwD will deal with that as well. We see the effects of the war across the lower 6 Kingdoms and begin to get an idea of what hell is coming next. Personally I think the use of AFfC and ADwD to fill the 5 year gap means that it will take more than 6 or 7 volumes to finish the series.
This book elevates Mr Martin into the upper echelons of American writers. A recent article called him the American Tolkien. That is already true. Perhaps the rest of the series will elevate him even further.
Links
Mr Martin's personal website, the only place for real info on the progress of the next book
http://www.georgerrmartin.com/
The best place to use as a clearing post if you will, it also has a great forum
http://www.westeros.org/
Mr Martin and his spouse occasionally pop in there with an announcement
A great place to discuss this book and fantasy and scifi in general
http://www.fantasyessentials.net
10/29/2005
Dirt Poor, Desparate, Pending Surgery...oh and I Just Won a Contest with a Prize I Cannot Claim
Ok, its been a while and it looks like the only person or thing that has posted a comment is some internet shill looking for clients for an online dating service.
Boy am I loved.
Well I am officialy dirt poor. I now can no longer purchase my own internet access. So how am I getting online you wonder? Well let's just say I am. Hehehe.
But I am still poor.
But I did get a raise. My awesome salary went from $12.36 to $12.731 . Yes a whole 3%. Stay in school kids, that's why I am back. Or I will be after a surgical procedure.
And no its not a lobotomy...
But this is starting to sound like a rant...
Or a bad song...
But I will take comfort from attractive Asian women...
And I get off on how Filipina chicks say "ok"....
...
... "Where's that online dating service...?"
Boy am I loved.
Well I am officialy dirt poor. I now can no longer purchase my own internet access. So how am I getting online you wonder? Well let's just say I am. Hehehe.
But I am still poor.
But I did get a raise. My awesome salary went from $12.36 to $12.731 . Yes a whole 3%. Stay in school kids, that's why I am back. Or I will be after a surgical procedure.
And no its not a lobotomy...
But this is starting to sound like a rant...
Or a bad song...
But I will take comfort from attractive Asian women...
And I get off on how Filipina chicks say "ok"....
...
... "Where's that online dating service...?"
8/24/2005
When Does an Agreement between State Governments become Collusion?
I don't have a particular problem with reducing emissions or being more enviromentally conservative, I am after a conservative, but this new "agreement" has gone too far.
-An aside- How come intrastate collusion to screw us on taxes is allowed? If we allegedly have the right to be protected from "illegal monopolies" that seek to restrain competition that would otherwise work in the consumers favor, do we not have the right to be free from agreements that would artificially cause our taxes to go higher?
Who's next?
Returning to my original topic is dificult as I would love to go off on this environmental nonsense, not that we do not have significant problems, but agreements like this are merely to address the symptoms. The true problem is that we need more and cleaner means to produce energy, not more ways to make peoples lives more difficult. Nuclear power, rebuilding and modernizing our hydroelectical damns (most of which are nearing the end of their projected functional lives), building those wind farms that the leftists don't like3, geothermal power and -a new one- ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC)4. Hell even home solar panels make sense now. But why won't those subsidies go for home solar, because that would make the people energy independent and the government, whose business should be protecting us from all forms of malfeasance, has tried to expand into providing for all of our needs.
Notes
1-NYT Article I quote several times from this wisdom of the left.
2- The left has now begun to disenfranchise illegal aliens.
3-Cape Cod times
4- Wired
-An aside- How come intrastate collusion to screw us on taxes is allowed? If we allegedly have the right to be protected from "illegal monopolies" that seek to restrain competition that would otherwise work in the consumers favor, do we not have the right to be free from agreements that would artificially cause our taxes to go higher?
"Enforcement of emission controls could potentially result in higher energy prices in the nine states, which officials hope can be offset by subsidies and support for the development of new technology that would be paid for with the proceeds from the sale of emission allowances to the utility companies."1So... in essence you and I, the tax payer are to be squeezed in new war between the leftist polticians and electorate of the blue states and the rightist/conservative/libetarian/conservative democrat/everyone else the left has alientated and disenfranchised on their road to utopia blue states.2
Who's next?
"In recent years, New York and other Northeastern states have aggressively tried to reduce power plant emissions. Several have joined together to sue coal-fired power plants in Midwestern states that produce sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide that drift across state borders and cause acid rain in the Northeast"1Oh wait, we're next. Or rather whatever source of money can be found for politicians to buy votes are next. You evil smokers, you evil fat people, you evil air conditioner users...
Returning to my original topic is dificult as I would love to go off on this environmental nonsense, not that we do not have significant problems, but agreements like this are merely to address the symptoms. The true problem is that we need more and cleaner means to produce energy, not more ways to make peoples lives more difficult. Nuclear power, rebuilding and modernizing our hydroelectical damns (most of which are nearing the end of their projected functional lives), building those wind farms that the leftists don't like3, geothermal power and -a new one- ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC)4. Hell even home solar panels make sense now. But why won't those subsidies go for home solar, because that would make the people energy independent and the government, whose business should be protecting us from all forms of malfeasance, has tried to expand into providing for all of our needs.
Notes
1-NYT Article I quote several times from this wisdom of the left.
2- The left has now begun to disenfranchise illegal aliens.
3-Cape Cod times
4- Wired
8/09/2005
The Once and Future Internet
The internet and private network access began as a people dialing up ISPs from several differnent telecom networks to their BBS services and their Inet providers and now that may be about to die...
Just a thought... I just read this article over on Techrepublic (for which free membership is required but one can probably find a similar story on one of the CNET news feeds). Independent ISPs are going extinct. Due to the current nature of the technology it is just more efficient to offer both hardware and software access through one vendor for any hardwired system.
What is the answer...
Not wireless, as in cellular access, that is just more of the same, alloted vendors with some sort of bandwidth selling internet access to us via that bandwidth.
However, if someone out there reads this, the best idea for competitative internet access is to set up wireless networking zones and then sell access to those points to people. Because then it does not matter how many wires come into the home, and which of the (eventually) three wires one chooses for access, there can be hundreds of competing wireless networks in any given area.
Just a thought...
Just a thought... I just read this article over on Techrepublic (for which free membership is required but one can probably find a similar story on one of the CNET news feeds). Independent ISPs are going extinct. Due to the current nature of the technology it is just more efficient to offer both hardware and software access through one vendor for any hardwired system.
What is the answer...
Not wireless, as in cellular access, that is just more of the same, alloted vendors with some sort of bandwidth selling internet access to us via that bandwidth.
However, if someone out there reads this, the best idea for competitative internet access is to set up wireless networking zones and then sell access to those points to people. Because then it does not matter how many wires come into the home, and which of the (eventually) three wires one chooses for access, there can be hundreds of competing wireless networks in any given area.
Just a thought...
7/14/2005
Eureka, I got VLC mediaplayer to work!!!!
I have (finally) gotten my beloved VLC media player, which seems to play everything except possible AAC files working in FC4.
Basically, I will simply this process for all who are interested.
First prepare. Open up FFx (by now any reader should have figured out that FFx is an abbrev for Firefox) and go to the following page
http://rpm.livna.org/configuration.html
This is the configuration page for the livna repository. You have to do basically two things here, both of which amount to the same thing. You must manually (as I detailed somewhat in an earlier post) or automatically configure your system for using yum on livna.
Under the FC4 section there is a section for yum. If you click on livna-release in the dl window which pops up, choose open with. It will prompt you for the root password. It worked correctly for me to automatically set up for livna. If not dl the file, save it to a known location (and FFx tip, in the download manager if you right click on a dled file, it will ask you -at least in linux- if you want to open the dl directory) and then run it with the command line listed there.
Then go here
http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshr...shrpms-release/
download the file that ends with noarch.rpm and install that by either of the above methods.
this sets up yum for the following site
http://freshrpms.net/
then open a terminal window
su -
(note the -, that makes things a lot easier)
enter the root password
on the next line type
yum install videolan-client
follow the prompts.
Basically, I will simply this process for all who are interested.
First prepare. Open up FFx (by now any reader should have figured out that FFx is an abbrev for Firefox) and go to the following page
http://rpm.livna.org/configuration.html
This is the configuration page for the livna repository. You have to do basically two things here, both of which amount to the same thing. You must manually (as I detailed somewhat in an earlier post) or automatically configure your system for using yum on livna.
Under the FC4 section there is a section for yum. If you click on livna-release in the dl window which pops up, choose open with. It will prompt you for the root password. It worked correctly for me to automatically set up for livna. If not dl the file, save it to a known location (and FFx tip, in the download manager if you right click on a dled file, it will ask you -at least in linux- if you want to open the dl directory) and then run it with the command line listed there.
Then go here
http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshr...shrpms-release/
download the file that ends with noarch.rpm and install that by either of the above methods.
this sets up yum for the following site
http://freshrpms.net/
then open a terminal window
su -
(note the -, that makes things a lot easier)
enter the root password
on the next line type
yum install videolan-client
follow the prompts.
7/12/2005
Playing God
Every act of the will, every choice a human being makes is in essence playing God.
Why?
First let us look for a defintion of God. This is complex but given the context of the phrase, we are talking about the Judeo-Christian-Islamic deity. The one predominant thread through all of three slightly divergent characterizations of God is that God is a being of will. What God wills of that which is possible, is done in Planck instant, or instantaneously, unless of course it wills that the thing should be done more slowly. If God is a being of will, then will is foundational to God's existence.
If God created man, what does that mean?
Core to this issue is a true definition of creation. For this I draw upon and expand from Nietzsche. Creation is a synonym for valuation. To truly create something is to place a value on. Whether that value is zero, some number, or incalculable, the placing of that value is what creates the thing that has the value. What is the value of rock? That depends, especially if that rock contains precious minerals, or has an asthetic appeal. But what if man (or God or some other sentient species) did not exist? To whom would those precious minerals be worth something or to whose emotions would that rock appeal? If God created man, it must be said that he placed a value upon something which was otherwise worthless clay, he found emotional satisfaction in the existence of of more like him.
If man is created in the image of God, then whatsoever is the quality that is foundational to God existence is also foundational to the human's existence. Therefore will is the foundation of true human existence, not reaction, emotion or subsistance. When a man reflects God, he exercises his will, and by definition is playing God.
Why?
First let us look for a defintion of God. This is complex but given the context of the phrase, we are talking about the Judeo-Christian-Islamic deity. The one predominant thread through all of three slightly divergent characterizations of God is that God is a being of will. What God wills of that which is possible, is done in Planck instant, or instantaneously, unless of course it wills that the thing should be done more slowly. If God is a being of will, then will is foundational to God's existence.
If God created man, what does that mean?
Core to this issue is a true definition of creation. For this I draw upon and expand from Nietzsche. Creation is a synonym for valuation. To truly create something is to place a value on. Whether that value is zero, some number, or incalculable, the placing of that value is what creates the thing that has the value. What is the value of rock? That depends, especially if that rock contains precious minerals, or has an asthetic appeal. But what if man (or God or some other sentient species) did not exist? To whom would those precious minerals be worth something or to whose emotions would that rock appeal? If God created man, it must be said that he placed a value upon something which was otherwise worthless clay, he found emotional satisfaction in the existence of of more like him.
If man is created in the image of God, then whatsoever is the quality that is foundational to God existence is also foundational to the human's existence. Therefore will is the foundation of true human existence, not reaction, emotion or subsistance. When a man reflects God, he exercises his will, and by definition is playing God.
Two Things to Fool Us All...
First, on Wednesday, NASA will finally launch the space shuttle again. Now despite any of their claims, the real reason that NASA does not want to fly the shuttle is that it is a waste of money. It costs in excess of 700 million to launch the damn thing. I am a proponent of manned exploration of space but the only valid reason left to launch the shuttle is the maintenance of the hubble and NASA is not planning to do that. NASA should be working intently on a space plane.
Note I recently read a decent novel, the earliest (in terms of occurance) novel in Ben Bova's grand tour sequence, Powersat. I heartily recommend this novel as a decent look into how the space program should be...private
One final note, you know that the only reason that the networks are covering this is because they want to see it blow up.
Second, who is Sen Harry Reid kidding, this is what is at stake with the new SC nominees:
Does this look like an economic drain?
Sen Reid is recently said to have stated that he won't filibuster any of President Bush's SC nominees unless there are extreme circumstances...
...You know, like the candidate is alive and breathing...
Any SC Justice who will be aggressively against the recent decision in Kelo vs. New London, will most likely be filibustered. The Democrats do not care. The liberal activist judiciary is their last chance to have some power.
Will the debate be civil read this
Note I recently read a decent novel, the earliest (in terms of occurance) novel in Ben Bova's grand tour sequence, Powersat. I heartily recommend this novel as a decent look into how the space program should be...private
One final note, you know that the only reason that the networks are covering this is because they want to see it blow up.
Second, who is Sen Harry Reid kidding, this is what is at stake with the new SC nominees:
Does this look like an economic drain?
Sen Reid is recently said to have stated that he won't filibuster any of President Bush's SC nominees unless there are extreme circumstances...
...You know, like the candidate is alive and breathing...
Any SC Justice who will be aggressively against the recent decision in Kelo vs. New London, will most likely be filibustered. The Democrats do not care. The liberal activist judiciary is their last chance to have some power.
Will the debate be civil read this
7/08/2005
Conspiracy Theorists are like Addicts
Conspiracy theorists are like addicts...
A recent glance through of a post over on Richard Hoagland's blog has led me to the notion that for many, once you start to "believe" in vast conspiracies, you become addicted. The post that inspired me to write this...
http://www.enterprisemission.com/weblog/2005/07/war-of-words.html
Now I actually like Mr Hoagland, although I have never met him. I think some of the points about certain things like Iapetus and the "face" on Mars deserve serious inquiry although I do not hold to his more grand interpretations. I happen to bookmark a bunch of sites that I group under a heading called weird stuff. I find some of this interesting at least from an entertainment pov.
But what I find annoying are these constant attempts to fit historical things with fairly straight forward explanations like the Kennedy assasination, 9/11 or the Columbia explosion into the grand conspiracy.
Take the Kennedy assasination for example, looked at with respect to possible conspiracies
Human beings are primates, and if you don't accept that where did that primate tailbone come from? Primates, especially the higher order ones, tend towards exclusive organizations. This tendency predominated and aided in driving evolution for millions of years, producing and refining a species which is capable of paranoia.
The average member of homosapiens, possible individuation aside, needs instinctually to associate in groups. Not only that, or as an out growth, these members tend to feel that others are in groups and a thought process arises from those unexplored primordial urges which rapidly takes the derivative of 2+2 but does not come out with zero.
So the fact that most people cannot shoot someone with pinpoint accuracy at several hundred to several thousands yards, makes them uninclined to accept the fact that a miitary trained sniper can. This of course makes spurious leaps of logic possible, in a certain famous assasination.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Ha...9s_marksmanship
People not only believe in big false conspiracies but in little ones. Santa and his helpers, parents deliberately trying to embarass their children, etc. It is a natural by porduct of our species evolution. It is in part what makes us such wonderful skeptics, as one actions also tends to produce the delevopement of compensatory mechanisms.
As to "real conspiracies" like communism or secret military missions, of course these events occur, and if we as a species did not possess the means to ferret these things out, we would have no need of intelligence classifications or the NSA.
The funny thing is that when a particular theory either does not come true, the explanations become, rarely, "it was thwarted" or, more commonly, "they were on to us knowing so they changed their nefarious plans". I was listenting to coasttocoastam last night, Thursday.
www.coasttocoastam.com
The show had on some guy named Sean David Morton who claims to be an expert in remote viewing, which is purported to be a psychic ability that lets one perceive eventss without actually being there. He also seems to be a radical leftist and is one of those with a visceral hatred of President Bush. He claimed that President Bush and his cadre will be attempting to turn the U.S. it a fascist dictatorship.
What is the explanation when neither occurs? Well as I have said, either we thwarted them or they changed their nefarious plans.
In science, for a theory to be true it must not only be demonstrable but have those demonstations be reproducable by others, and it must make successful predictions. Einstein's Relativity is not only constantly validated through reporducable experiments, reused machinery (the GPS system for instance) but several of its predictions have been proved true. But these facts that are validated are not themselves truths. The truth proved is that the facts are real and recorded as such or more specifically that the people involved in origin were honest and correct.
In one were to hold any conspiracy theory to these same standards, most if not all would fail the test. A serious of predictions which have a magical caveat like, "we thwarted them" is not a theory but an outlandish collection of unsubstantiated claims.
A recent glance through of a post over on Richard Hoagland's blog has led me to the notion that for many, once you start to "believe" in vast conspiracies, you become addicted. The post that inspired me to write this...
http://www.enterprisemission.com/weblog/2005/07/war-of-words.html
Now I actually like Mr Hoagland, although I have never met him. I think some of the points about certain things like Iapetus and the "face" on Mars deserve serious inquiry although I do not hold to his more grand interpretations. I happen to bookmark a bunch of sites that I group under a heading called weird stuff. I find some of this interesting at least from an entertainment pov.
But what I find annoying are these constant attempts to fit historical things with fairly straight forward explanations like the Kennedy assasination, 9/11 or the Columbia explosion into the grand conspiracy.
Take the Kennedy assasination for example, looked at with respect to possible conspiracies
Human beings are primates, and if you don't accept that where did that primate tailbone come from? Primates, especially the higher order ones, tend towards exclusive organizations. This tendency predominated and aided in driving evolution for millions of years, producing and refining a species which is capable of paranoia.
The average member of homosapiens, possible individuation aside, needs instinctually to associate in groups. Not only that, or as an out growth, these members tend to feel that others are in groups and a thought process arises from those unexplored primordial urges which rapidly takes the derivative of 2+2 but does not come out with zero.
So the fact that most people cannot shoot someone with pinpoint accuracy at several hundred to several thousands yards, makes them uninclined to accept the fact that a miitary trained sniper can. This of course makes spurious leaps of logic possible, in a certain famous assasination.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Ha...9s_marksmanship
People not only believe in big false conspiracies but in little ones. Santa and his helpers, parents deliberately trying to embarass their children, etc. It is a natural by porduct of our species evolution. It is in part what makes us such wonderful skeptics, as one actions also tends to produce the delevopement of compensatory mechanisms.
As to "real conspiracies" like communism or secret military missions, of course these events occur, and if we as a species did not possess the means to ferret these things out, we would have no need of intelligence classifications or the NSA.
The funny thing is that when a particular theory either does not come true, the explanations become, rarely, "it was thwarted" or, more commonly, "they were on to us knowing so they changed their nefarious plans". I was listenting to coasttocoastam last night, Thursday.
www.coasttocoastam.com
The show had on some guy named Sean David Morton who claims to be an expert in remote viewing, which is purported to be a psychic ability that lets one perceive eventss without actually being there. He also seems to be a radical leftist and is one of those with a visceral hatred of President Bush. He claimed that President Bush and his cadre will be attempting to turn the U.S. it a fascist dictatorship.
What is the explanation when neither occurs? Well as I have said, either we thwarted them or they changed their nefarious plans.
In science, for a theory to be true it must not only be demonstrable but have those demonstations be reproducable by others, and it must make successful predictions. Einstein's Relativity is not only constantly validated through reporducable experiments, reused machinery (the GPS system for instance) but several of its predictions have been proved true. But these facts that are validated are not themselves truths. The truth proved is that the facts are real and recorded as such or more specifically that the people involved in origin were honest and correct.
In one were to hold any conspiracy theory to these same standards, most if not all would fail the test. A serious of predictions which have a magical caveat like, "we thwarted them" is not a theory but an outlandish collection of unsubstantiated claims.
A Little Bit About This Blog
Well my first post on my first ever blog, concerned the events of 7/7/05. But politics and war are not the only things that I will talk about, hopefully if any one ever reads this blog what I post will be of interest or at least give you a good laugh, either with me or at me.
My interests run through many areas and you may or may not see evidence of that here.
What am I reading now?
"Shadow Warriors: Inside the Special Forces" by Tom Clancy and Gen Carl Steiner (Ret).
So far so good.
Back to 7/7/05 for a minute, so far the response has been encouraging if not overwhelming. I am not a warmonger (and I have never served in the military) but I remember history. My Roman ancestors did not take shit from anyone. If you messed with them, your civilization died. Maybe its time that another one of these terrorist hot spots died, maybe Syria now? What if in response to every terrorist act, we destroyed via bombing the military and industrial assets of a nation, no need for a land invasion, just raise the cost of doing business.
I do know if I will have multiple small entries in the future or just some long (hopefully) well segmented entries. Probably both.
On the PC side, I am currently transistioning to Linux, I've tried Debian but was too new to get the gui to load. I then moved on to FC4 but getting DVDs to play has proved impossible so now I am going to try UBuntu. Let's see if this one works or if Linux is really a pipe dream.
My interests run through many areas and you may or may not see evidence of that here.
What am I reading now?
"Shadow Warriors: Inside the Special Forces" by Tom Clancy and Gen Carl Steiner (Ret).
So far so good.
Back to 7/7/05 for a minute, so far the response has been encouraging if not overwhelming. I am not a warmonger (and I have never served in the military) but I remember history. My Roman ancestors did not take shit from anyone. If you messed with them, your civilization died. Maybe its time that another one of these terrorist hot spots died, maybe Syria now? What if in response to every terrorist act, we destroyed via bombing the military and industrial assets of a nation, no need for a land invasion, just raise the cost of doing business.
I do know if I will have multiple small entries in the future or just some long (hopefully) well segmented entries. Probably both.
On the PC side, I am currently transistioning to Linux, I've tried Debian but was too new to get the gui to load. I then moved on to FC4 but getting DVDs to play has proved impossible so now I am going to try UBuntu. Let's see if this one works or if Linux is really a pipe dream.
7/07/2005
We Will Never Surrender...
To the people of London, of the UK, my best wishes go out to you. You have survived through far worse, you will survive and grow stronger.
And now for some violent thoughts.
Perhaps we have not killed enough terrorists. Maybe its time to move on to the next source of terror, Iran, Syria, the IRA. It is sickening how much we, the tolerant of the world are supposed to take before we respond in kind and that is not a good thing. Sooner or later these murderers are going to strike against the wrong people, tick off the wrong rich person or accidently hit some drug cartel lord's family and then when that level of bloodshed begins to sicken us, we will act to clean up the mess.
And now for some violent thoughts.
Perhaps we have not killed enough terrorists. Maybe its time to move on to the next source of terror, Iran, Syria, the IRA. It is sickening how much we, the tolerant of the world are supposed to take before we respond in kind and that is not a good thing. Sooner or later these murderers are going to strike against the wrong people, tick off the wrong rich person or accidently hit some drug cartel lord's family and then when that level of bloodshed begins to sicken us, we will act to clean up the mess.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)